Chitika

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Class Action News 4th August 2015

PetroChina Co on Monday won the dismissal of a US class-action lawsuit arising from an alleged bribery scheme at China's state-run oil company.
US District Judge Edgardo Ramos in Manhattan dismissed claims by PetroChina investors who accused the company and various officials, including former Chairman Jiang Jiemin, of deceiving them about its internal controls and governance.

JPMorgan, Simpson Sued Over Mistake in GM Loan: Business of Law


It was only a matter of time.
One of the participants in a $1.5 billion term loan that JPMorgan Chase & Co. made to General Motors Corp. before its bankruptcy is now suing the bank and its lawyers at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP.
The reason: a mistake in the recording of the security interest in the loan, initially made by an associate at Mayer Brown LLP but not caught by those reviewing the documents at both JPMorgan and Simpson Thacher. That mistake eradicated the security interest that would have paid the loan in full despite the carmaker’s bankruptcy in 2009.
The Employees’ Retirement System of the City of Montgomery, Alabama, filed a class action on July 30 in federal court in Manhattan against the bank and Simpson Thacher. The pension fund wants to represent what it says are 400 participants in the term loan.

Action 9 investigates claims against impotence clinic

An Orange County man claims an impotence clinic charged him thousands for prescription treatments that failed. 

The Men's Medical Clinic has dozens of complaints against it, and it was just sued by the Massachusetts attorney general for deceptive sales.  
 

Action 9's Todd Ulrich found the clinic’s founder has been in trouble with Florida regulators before.
An advertisement for Men's Medical Clinic claimed it offers 180 different prescription blends for erectile dysfunction.

Securities Class Action Filings Remain Below Historical Average

 Plaintiffs brought 85 new federal class action securities cases in the first half of 2015, according to Securities Class Action Filings—2015 Midyear Assessment, a report compiled by Cornerstone Research and the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse. This represents a decrease from the second half of 2014, when plaintiffs filed 92 securities class actions. The number of filings in the first six months of 2015 remains 10 percent below the semiannual average of 94 observed between 1997 and 2014 – the seventh consecutive semiannual period below the historical average.
Despite this period of little overall change in filing activity, securities class actions against companies headquartered outside the United States increased in the first half of 2015. Twenty filings, or 24 percent of the total, targeted foreign firms. Asian firms were named in more than half of these cases.
New Indiegogo project allow entrepreneurs to take a piece of Google / Microsoft.
Google and Microsoft’s search engines post ads that general billions of dollars in income each year.  Often, these ads are placed alongside organic search results based on the keywords a user inputs.  Costs for these ads are based on the popularity of keyword searches and can run from five cents to double-digit dollars.  Now, the giant companies have marked low-price keywords “irrelevant” and have stopped offering ads based on these keywords, creating artificial shortage and pushing ad prices to the dollar range. $2 per click ads are even made part of the organic listing tempting the unsuspected searcher to click on it thinking it organic result.  Further, the two companies have confiscated certain keywords to further generate artificial shortages and push prices up.  
All of these activities affect private entrepreneurs and small businesses.
Now, a group has launched an IndieGoGo campaign to raise legal fees to file a class action lawsuit against Microsoft and Google for these practices.  
The goal of the crowd funding resource is to generate half a million dollars to pay for legal fees.  If successful, this lawsuit would require Google and Microsoft to release banned and “irrelevant” keywords to the public and compensate businesses for their losses.

Hagens Berman Seeks Info Regarding Youth Soccer Head Injuries in Nationwide Class Action

 Parents of children who have played youth soccer or continue to play youth soccer and have sustained head injuries during play are encouraged to contact Hagens Berman, a national consumer-rights and sports litigation law firm that has sued multiple soccer organizations for failing to protect players from head injuries.


Hagens Berman filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of several current and former soccer players against soccer’s worldwide governing body, FIFA, and affiliated soccer organizations in the United States including U.S. Youth Soccer and American Youth Soccer – leagues responsible for over three million child and adolescent soccer players in the United States – for allegedly failing to incorporate up-to-date guidelines into their concussion policies.


No comments:

Post a Comment